Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of PTVS_Ideas

Timestamp:

Jan 13, 2010, 10:35:23 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

sinziana.mazilu

Comment:

--

PTVS_Ideas

@@ -40 +40 @@
 Is a good step to divide the work, but is not enough. Presume that we have more processors, we can use them.
 
-2. Another approach is to assign a processor to each road. In VANET simulators (and also, in real world VANETS), cars are processing messages.  
+2. Another approach is to assign a processor to each road. In VANET simulators (and also, in real world VANETS), cars are processing messages. So, we can say that messages are computed on the road. On each road are messages interchanges and computation events. There will be as many work-pools as roads. Each work-pool will have all the messages that are computed on the same road. GPS Events and Cleanup events will be computed on another work-pool, by a single processor.
+
+3. The third idea, and the best from all three is to assign a processor to an intersection. Most of messages interchanges are on intersections. So most of Send or Receive events will be close to intersections. So, a work-pool is assigned to each intersection. Events that happen between two intersection, will be assigned to the closest one (easy to compute that using GPS coordinates). Again, we will have a special processor for GPS and Cleanup events.
+