36 | | We evaluated the frameworks from a high performance and scalability point of view. In the 2-cluster node, MapReduce's tunning gave results and it performed much better than Pig. [[Image()]] |
| 36 | We evaluated the frameworks from a high performance and scalability point of view. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | In the 2-cluster node, MapReduce's tunning gave results and it performed much better than Pig. [[Image(mr_vs_pig.png)]] |
| 40 | |
| 41 | The framework is indeed suitable for large data processing, as shown in the charts below. Increasing the replication factor would have probably increased the throughput for the seti dataset [[Image(throughput_2.png)]] [[Image(time_char_1.png)]] [[Image(time_chart.png)]]. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | When testing for |